I was questioned about my views of the OWS
protests. I provide the following response.
I
share many of the views of the OWS movement. However, I am aware of the
complexity of what we are dealing with. It is horrendous what Wall Street got
away with and equally horrendous what continues to happen. Banks that are too
big to fail are, in fact, too big. I think that retail and investment banks
should be separate. Investment banks rise and fall on their own merits. I also
think that the pay given to bankers and investors is obscene.
Having said that, I don't think that changing the
pay structure of finance executives or revamping bank structures will make
things significantly better. There will be less anger against some, but then
the continued frustrations with the lack of jobs, the level of income of many
workers, including the middle class, the housing issue, etc. will remain. If
one could wave a magic wand, housing would generally be less and inflation
would be low. Income would be commensurate with a generally less expensive cost
of living. But, for this to happen without hurting so many of our peoples who
would lose much of their investments for retirement, without causing our
economy to be even less competitive, without disrupting structures that cannot
be easily changed, e.g., higher education costs have sky rocketed and one
cannot imagine in the near future how these costs will be ameliorated, is
extraordinarily complex.
In short, everything is a mess and fixing any one
component may be a start, but the process will take so long that many will be
frustrated with their personal situation. As I write, I sit comfortably in
front of the ocean. I am warm. I am secure. I no more deserve this good
fortune than those who are angry. But trying to restore an equilibrium that has
been so disrupted by so many events in a global economy is no small trick!
The question that any religious leader would
address then is: given that the problems are beyond the scope of traditional
business cycles, how does a Christian respond in a meaningful way? If the
answer is the usual Gospel response to the poor, I would question its validity
in terms of addressing the problems in any meaningful way. While an individual
may have no other recourse than reaching out to someone in need to remain
consistent with the person’s value system, it is virtually meaningless. Possibly,
some may have some long-term benefit, but I don't think episodic and random
charity is meaningful within the context of our national/international
problems. A Christian may feel that he/she may have no choice, given the value
system they are committed to. It would be delusional, however, to think that it
is making any real difference.
What we need is collective political action that
addresses some of these humongous problems, e.g., Europe and US agree that
there will transaction taxes on investments, that retail and investment banks
be separated, that pay structures be somewhat regulated, that tax structures be
modified to represent a fair distribution of how revenue is achieved, that
higher education agree to reforms that will reduce costs, e.g., great
professors are shared in many, if not all, universities through on-line
technology, thereby reducing faculty costs, that trade agreements be based on
fairness to all nations, etc. etc.
But, I know that collective political action is also a delusion. One
cannot think about the set of problems confronting so many with so little
leadership without fearing that frustrations and anger will lead to violence
and social unrest. Should such happen, what is a bad situation will only become
much worse.
No comments:
Post a Comment